https://www.efficiencynorth.net/ does not consider self-defense to be good cause for a concealed carry permit.
Peruta’s attorneys want the justices to overturn a U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals can t write essays that the Second Amendment does not grant the right to carry a gun outside the home, Off The Grid News previously reported. The Ninth Circuit ruled against essay about the invention of the car in a 7-4 decision in June 2016.
“The right of a member of the general public to carry a concealed firearm in public is not, and never has been, protected by the Second Amendment,” the Ninth Circuit’s majority opinion read. “Therefore, because the Second Amendment does not protect in any degree the right to carry concealed firearms in public, any prohibition or restriction a state may choose to impose on concealed carry — including a requirement of ‘good cause,’ however defined — is necessarily allowed by the Amendment.”
Former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement challenged that ruling in January 2017, The Union Tribune reported. Second Amendment activists and gun control advocates are watching the case closely, not only because of the issue but because it could be the first major firearms decision heard by new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Although Gorsuch has been a federal judge for years, he’s never ruled on a Second Amendment case.
Peruta could be the most important gun-rights case since the 2008 Heller decision, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment grants Americans the rights to keep guns in their homes, UCLA Law Professor Adam Winkler told The Los Angeles Times. greasy lake essay overturned the District of Columbia’s ban on private ownership of handguns.
What do you think? Should concealed carry be a constitutional right? Share your thoughts in the section below:
This Article Was Originally Posted On offthegridnews.com Read the Original Article here